Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection in infants and children during first and second waves in Minia Governorate – Egypt

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of forensic medicine and clinical toxicology, Faculty of medicine, Minia University

2 Department of Pediatric Medicine & Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University

3 Department of Chest Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University

Abstract

Background: Coronaviruses causing dangerous diseases for both humans and animals. A new coronavirus was found to be the source of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China's Hubei province, at the end of 2019. The aim of the study is determined various clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in infant and children. Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted at Minia isolation hospitals and Minia University Hospital of Pediatrics, Minia, Egypt during the period from the first of April, 2020 to 31th of august 2021. 62 children were included in this study aged from 4 months -16 years. Infants and children were diagnosed as Covid-19 positive with real time PCR, then we compare these data between the 1st wave (during 2020) and the 2nd wave (during 2021). Results: The second wave of 2021 showed significant difference as regarding comorbidities, respiratory symptoms and signs. Conclusion: Children at any age and both sexes are susceptible to COVID-19 virus infection. Conclusion: Children cases in the year 2020, show no or mild clinical manifestations compared with whose admitted during 2021.
 
 
 
 
 

Highlights

Conclusion

Children at any age and both sexes are susceptible to COVID-19 virus infection. Children cases in the year 2020, show no or mild clinical manifestations compared with whose admitted during 2021. Presence of chronic co-morbidities aggravate the clinical presentation and increase the risk for mortalities. Finally with each new wave of COVID-19 pandemic infection, the children more severely affected with the virus.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Introduction

Coronaviruses causing dangerous diseases for both humans and animals. A new coronavirus was found to be the source of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China's Hubei province, at the end of 2019. It quickly spread throughout China, culminating in an epidemic, with a growing number of cases reported in other countries throughout the world.(1) COVID-19 infection rates in children are relatively low, and published data on COVID-19 focuses mostly on adults. On January 20, 2020, the first pediatric case was recorded in a 10-year-old kid from Shenzhen, China, whose family had visited Wuhan City.(2)

 

Children tend to be less likely than adults to be impacted. Children often account for 1 to 5% of laboratory-confirmed cases in surveillance from various countries. Children under the age of 18 make up around 6% of laboratory-confirmed cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States. The American Academy of Pediatrics publishes data on the number of cases in children in each state. COVID-19 is available to children of all ages.(3)

 

COVID-19 symptoms are comparable in children and adults, although symptom frequency differs. Although severe cases have been observed, COVID-19 appears to be milder in children than in adults. Boys and girls were equally impacted among the 69,703 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases in children aged 20 years reported to the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by May 30, 2020.(4)

The following symptoms were most common in children aged 0 to 9 years: 63 percent of people have a fever, cough, or shortness of breath. In smaller case series, similar clinical symptoms, including sore throat and exhau-stion, have been documented. Chills or shaking chills have been recorded as additional symptoms in adults.(5)

 
Patients and methods

This prospective clinical study was conducted at Minia isolation hospitals and Minia University Hospital of Pediatrics, Minia, Egypt during the period from the first of April, 2020 to 31th of august 2021.  62 children were included in this study aged from 3 months -16 years. Infants and children were diagnosed as Covid-19 positive with real time PCR. The aim of the study is determine various clinical manifes-tations of COVID-19 in infant and children and also compare these data between the 1st wave (during 2020) and the 2nd wave (during 2021) in Egypt.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: from 0 up to 18 years old
  • Covid-19 diagnosis confirmed laboratory with real-time PCR

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspected cases (not confirmed with PCR)
  • Associated blood diseases
  • Associated autoimmune diseases

Data collection

All infants and children were subjected to:

  1. Full history:
  2.  
  3.  
  4. History of upper or lower respiratory tract infection
  5. History of medical problems
  6. History of chronic diseases
  7. Family history of recent COVID 19 infections
  8. . Family history of any medical conditions
  9. Thorough clinical examination to all children:
  10. General examination:
  11. Vital signs: temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure
  12. Head and Neck. Examination of any abnormalities in head and neck, or lymph node enlargement
  13. Neurological examination
  14. Cardiovascular examination
  15. Abdominal examination
  16. Musculoskeletal examination
  17. Back and genitalia.
  18. Systemic examination:

Respiratory examinations: inspection of the chest for any deformities or limitation of respiratory movements, palpation and percussion of the chest for any abnormalities, and auscultation for breath sounds, air entry, crepitation or wheezes

 

Statistical Methods

The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 25.

Descriptive statistics were done for parametric (normally distributed) quanti-tative data by mean, Standard deviation (SD) and mini-mum and maximum of range and for non-parametric quantitative data by median and interquartile range (IQR), while for qualitative data by frequ-ency and percentage.

Analyses were done between the two years for parametric quantitative data using Independent Samples T test and for non-parametric quantitative data using Mann Whitney test. Analyses were done between the two groups for Qualitative data using Chi square test and Fisher’s exact test. The level of significance was taken at (P value ≤ 0.05)

Results

During the period of the study 62 children were admitted to hospital and diagnosed as COVID-19 Positive, aged from 4 months -16 years with median age of 4 years and IQR (0.5-9). 34 males and 28 females. The hospital stay was ranged from 2-19 days with median 8 days IQR (6-9). From 62 patients 48 patient discharged to their

homes and 14 patients died. Patients with chronic illness was 16 out of 62 (25.8%), most of them were suffered from cardiac diseases (8.1%), renal diseases (6.5%) and Down’s syndrome (6.5%) Fig. 1.

Comparisons between the 2 pandemic waves of COVID-19 in Egypt “the 1st wave was at 2020 and the 2nd wave was at 2021” there was insignificant differences as regarding age and sex distribution of the patients. Patients admitted during 2021 year showed significant increase in the incidence of the chronic illness (48.4%) compared to (3.2%) during 2020 year. (Table 1)

As regarding frequency of most relevant clinical manifestation of COVID-19, patients admitted during 2021 years showed significant increase in the frequ-ency of fever, cough, dyspnea, respiratory distress and diarrhea in compared with those who admitted during 2020, While the frequency of skin rash was signific-antly increased at 2020. Abdominal pain and vomiting showed insignificant differ-ence between the two years. (Table 2)

 

General examination of patients revealed that, GCS, fair general condition and SO2 showed significant increase in patients admitted during 2020, while heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, frequency of cyanosis and frequency of sluggish pupil showed significant increase in patient admitted during 2021. Blood pressure showed insignificant differences between the two years. (Table 3)

As regarding systemic examination, patients admitted during 2021 showed significant increase in the frequency of decreased air entry, wheezes, crepitations, mechanical ventilation, abnormal CNS examination and abnormal CVS exami-nation. Abdominal examination showed insignificant difference between the two years. (Table 4)

Table 1: Demographic data between the 2020 and 2021

 

 

 

Year

P value

2020

2021

N=31

N=31

Age

Median

IQR

6

(1.5-9)

1.5

(0.3-9)

0.094

< 1 year

1-10 years

>10 years

6 (19.4%)

19(61.2%)

6(19.4%)

14 (45.2%)

11(35.5%)

6(19.4%)

0.069

Sex

Male

Female

18(58.1%)

13(41.9%)

16(51.6%)

15(48.4%)

0.610

Chronic disease

No

Yes

30(96.8%)

1(3.2%)

16(51.6%)

15(48.4%)

<0.001*

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Clinical presentation between the 2020 and 2021

 

 

 

Year

P value

2020

2021

N=31

N=31

Fever

No

Yes

14(45.2%)

17(54.8%)

1(3.2%)

30(96.8%)

<0.001*

Cough

No

Yes

26(83.9%)

5(16.1%)

3(9.7%)

28(90.3%)

<0.001*

SOB

No

Yes

30(96.8%)

1(3.2%)

0(0%)

31(100%)

<0.001*

RD grade

No

I

II

III

IV

30(96.8%)

1(3.2%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

2(6.5%)

19(61.3%)

9(29%)

1(3.2%)

<0.001*

Vomiting

No

Yes

27(87.1%)

4(12.9%)

24(77.4%)

7(22.6%)

0.319

Diarrhea

No

Yes

19(61.3%)

12(38.7%)

31(100%)

0(0%)

<0.001*

Abdominal pain

No

Yes

28(90.3%)

3(9.7%)

26(83.9%)

5(16.1%)

0.449

Skin rash

No

Yes

24(77.4%)

7(22.6%)

31(100%)

0(0%)

0.005*

 

 

Table 3: General examination between the 2020 and 2021

 

 

 

Year

P value

2020

2021

N=31

N=31

GCS

Range

Mean ± SD

(14-15)

14.5±0.5

(7-15)

11.2±2.5

<0.001*

General condition

Fair

Less than fair

Bad

31(100%)

0(0%)

0(0%)

15(48.4%)

6(19.4%)

10(32.3%)

<0.001*

Cyanosis

No

Yes

31(100%)

0(0%)

22(71%)

9(29%)

0.002*

Pupil

RRR

Sluggish

31(100%)

0(0%)

24(77.4%)

7(22.6%)

0.011*

HR

Range

Mean ± SD

(75-95)

85.6±6.4

(90-180)

128.1±19.1

<0.001*

RR

Median

IQR

(15-25)

19.7±2.5

(20-60)

39±10.9

<0.001*

Temperature

Range

Mean ± SD

(37-37)

37±0

(37-39)

37.7±0.5

<0.001*

SBP

Range

Mean ± SD

(90-105)

96.6±5.1

(70-140)

99.4±14.3

0.321

DBP

Range

Mean ± SD

(60-70)

64.8±3.8

(40-100)

61.6±12.1

0.166

SO2

Range

Mean ± SD

(98-99)

98.8±0.4

(80-99)

94.5±5.5

<0.001*

 

Table 4: Systemic examination and mechanical ventilation between the 2020 and 2021

 

 

 

Year

P value

2020

2021

N=31

N=31

Air entry

Fair

Decreased

30(96.8%)

1(3.2%)

2(6.5%)

29(93.5%)

<0.001*

Wheezes

No

Yes

30(96.8%)

1(3.2%)

13(41.9%)

18(58.1%)

<0.001*

Crepitation

No

Yes

31(100%)

0(0%)

8(25.8%)

23(74.2%)

<0.001*

Abdominal

NAD

Abnormal

31(100%)

0(0%)

28(90.3%)

3(9.7%)

0.238

CNS

NAD

Abnormal

31(100%)

0(0%)

24(77.4%)

7(22.6%)

0.011*

CVS

NAD

Abnormal

31(100%)

0(0%)

23(74.2%)

8(25.8%)

0.005*

Mechanical ventilation

No

Yes

31(100%)

0(0%)

21(67.7%)

10(32.3%)

0.001*

 

 

 

 

Fig. 1: History of chronic diseases of all patients

 

 

 

Discussion

Regarding the clinical data of the current study, our results was in accordance with Nallasamy et al., 2021(6) who found that 68% of his patients aged 1-10 years, 29% aged less than 1 year and 3% aged older than 10 years, and also disagree with Lenicek Krleza et al., 2021(7) who found that 8.8% of his patients were below one year, 53.1% of his patients from 1-10 years and 38.1% were older than 10 years, but also it showed insignificant difference between the two waves. Our results were in contrast with Dewi et al, 2021(8) who reported no cases of Covid below one year.

COVID-19 may put babies under the age of one at a greater risk of serious illness than older children. This is likely owing to their undeveloped immune systems and narrower airways, which make them more susceptible to respiratory viral infections that cause breathing problems. Eastin, C., & Eastin, T. 2020,(9) So neonates in developing countries are more at risk to be infected than those in developed countries.

As regarding sex distribution, our result was in accordance with Polónyiová et al., 2021(10) who found that 54.8% were males and 45.2% were females, and also agree with Lenicek Krleza et al., 2021(7) who found that 52.7 % male and 47.8% females. The explanation for this is that such difference is common in countries such as India which have a preference for male gender Shukla et al., 2014.(11) Also, the females have stronger humoral and cellular immune responses to infection or antigenic stimulation which can be beneficial in protection and clearance of various pathogens Muenchhoff and Goulder  2014(12) this male predominance may be due to a gene located on the X chromosome involved with the function of the thymus or with synthesis of immunoglobulin Ghosh & Klein, 2017.(13)

Regarding chronic illness, our study match with results of Nallasamy et al., 2021(6) who found that 19% of patients suffered from comorbidities, 6% was cardiac, 6% with developmental disorders and 3% with renal disorders. In our results we found that the frequency of comorbidities was higher at the second wave, this was disagreed with Krajcar et al, 2020(14) who found that comorbidities were higher during the first wave. Sharif et al., 2021(15) decided that increasing comorbidities with other factors were associated with more severe symptoms, high fatality rates and prolonged hospital stay in patients with COVID-19. Inflammation and impaired innate immune responses are common symptoms of chronic medical problems in patients. This may make such people more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and illness consequences. Yang et al., 2020(16)

 

As regarding clinical manifestations of COVID 19, our study was in agreement with Chua et al., 2021(17) who found that increase the rate of respiratory symptoms during 2021 and last 2020. While Krajcar et al., 2020(14) was disagree with us as they found that increase the frequency of respiratory and GIT manifestation during the 1st wave. This difference in frequency of clinical manifestations between different wave may be due to SARS-CoV-2 strains mutations such as the spike protein D614G mutation which is assoc-iated with increase the rate of infection of COVID-19 Korber et al., 2020(18)

Regarding general and systemic exami-nation of our patients, those admitted during 2021 were higher affected than who admitted during 2020, as they showed more affected general condition and disturbed conscious level and also showed cyanosis, tachypnea and tachycardia. Respiratory system examination revealed that patients admitted during 2021 were highly affected, as some of them need mechanical ventilation (32.3%). This can be explained by the increase of presence of comorbidities in 2021 and mutations of the virus COVID CDC, 2020(19)

  1. References
    1. World Health Organization. "WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020. 2020." Reference Source.
    2. Chan, J. F.-W., S. Yuan, K.-H. Kok, K. K.-W. To, H. Chu, J. Yang, F. Xing, J. Liu, C. C.-Y. Yip and R. W.-S. Poon. "A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster." The lancet 2020; 395 (10223): 514-523.
    3. Wu, Z. and J. M. McGoogan. "Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention." Jama 2020; 323(13): 1239-1242.
    4. Stokes, E. K., L. D. Zambrano, K. N. Anderson, E. P. Marder, K. M. Raz, S. E. B. Felix, Y. Tie and K. E. Fullerton. "Coronavirus disease 2019 case surveillance—United States, January 22–May 30, 2020." Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020;69(24): 759.
    5. Liguoro, I., C. Pilotto, M. Bonanni, M. E. Ferrari, A. Pusiol, A. Nocerino, E. Vidal and P. Cogo. "SARS-COV-2 infection in children and newborns: a systematic review." European journal of pediatrics 2020;179: 1029-1046.
    6. Nallasamy, K., S. K. Angurana, M. Jayashree, J. L. Mathew, A. Bansal, M. P. Singh, I. Bora, P. Laxmi, S. Verma and N. Sankhyan. "Clinical profile, hospital course and outcome of children with COVID-19." The Indian Journal of Pediatrics: 2021;1-6.
    7. Lenicek Krleza, J., V. Stevanovic, A. Lukic-Grlic, I. Tabain, Z. Misak, G. Roic, B. Kaic, D. Mayer, Z. Hruskar and L. Barbic. "Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in Children’s Hospital Zagreb during the initial and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Croatia." Bio-chemia Medica 2021;31(2):283-294.
    8. Dewi, R., N. Kaswandani, M. R. Karyanti, D. B. Setyanto, A. H. Pudjiadi, A. Hendarto, M. M. Djer, A. Prayitno, I. Yuniar and W. Indawati. "Mortality in children with positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test: Lessons learned from a tertiary referral hospital in Indonesia." International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2021;107: 78-85.
    9. Eastin, C. and T. Eastin. "Epidemio-logical characteristics of 2143 pedia-tric patients with 2019 coronavirus disease in China: Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, et al. Pediatrics. 2020." Journal of Emergency Medicine 2020;58(4): 712-713.
    10. Polónyiová, K., I. Belica, H. Celušáková, K. Janšáková, M. Kopčíková, Ž. Szapuová and D. Ostatníková (2021). "Comparing the impact of the first and second wave of COVID-19 lockdown on Slovak families with typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder." Autism: 13623613211051480.
    11. Shukla, V. V., S. M. Nimbalkar, A. G. Phatak and J. D. Ganjiwale. "Critical analysis of PIM2 score applicability in a tertiary care PICU in Western India." International journal of pediatrics
    12. Muenchhoff, M. and P. J. Goulder. "Sex differences in pediatric infectious diseases." The Journal of infectious diseases 2014; 209(suppl_3): S120-S126.
    13. Ghosh, S. and R. S. Klein. "Sex drives dimorphic immune responses to viral infections." The journal of immunology 2017;198(5): 1782-1790.
    14. Krajcar, N., L. S. Marić, A. Šurina, S. K. Filipović, V. Trkulja, S. Roglić and G. Tešović. "Epidemiological and clinical features of Croatian children and adolescents with a PCR-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019: differences between the first and second epidemic wave." Croatian Medical Journal 2020;61(6): 491.
    15. Sharif, N., R. R. Opu, S. N. Ahmed, M. K. Sarkar, R. Jaheen, M. U. Daullah, S. Khan, M. Mubin, H. Rahman and F. Islam. "Prevalence and impact of comorbidities on disease prognosis among patients with COVID-19 in Bangladesh: A nationwide study amid the second wave." Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 2021;15(4): 102148.
    16. Yang, J., Y. Zheng, X. Gou, K. Pu, Z. Chen, Q. Guo, R. Ji, H. Wang, Y. Wang and Y. Zhou. "Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis." International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2020;94: 91-95.
    17. Chua, G. T., J. S. C. Wong, I. Lam, P. P. K. Ho, W. H. Chan, F. Y. S. Yau, J. S. R. Duque, A. C. C. Ho, K. K. Siu and T. W. Cheung. "Clinical Charac-teristics and Transmission of COVID-19 in Children and Youths During 3 Waves of Outbreaks in Hong Kong." JAMA network open 2021;4(5): e218824-e218824.
    18. Korber, B., W. Fischer, S. Gnanakaran, H. Yoon, J. Theiler, W. Abfalterer, B. Foley, E. E. Giorgi, T. Bhattacharya and M. D. Parker. "Spike mutation pipeline reveals the emergence of a more transmissible form of SARS-CoV-2." BioRxiv.2020
    1. Covid, C., R. Team, C. Covid, R. Team, C. COVID, R. Team, S. Bialek, R. Gierke, M. Hughes and L. A. McNamara. "Coronavirus disease 2019 in children—United States, february 12–april 2, 2020." Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020; 69(14): 422.