Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Medicine Minia university
Abstract
Highlights
Conclusion
lidocaine was more effective in attenuating cough in eye surgery and provide satisfactory analgesic effect after surgery.
Keywords
Main Subjects
Introduction
Local anesthesia for eye surgery is increasingly popular, but there will always be a need for general anesthesia. Patients may refuse local anesthesia, may be unable to keep still or lie flat for the duration of surgery or lack the mental facility to cooperate whilst awake. Young children and those with allergy to local anesthetic also need general anesthesia (1)
Cough during emergence from general anesthesia is considered critical event as it may lead to surgical bleeding laryngospasm hemodynamic instability (2) and could be life threatening in patients who are at risk of complications related to increase in intracranial or intraocular pressure (3,4).
Recently lidocaine administration has been widely used for reducing cough during extubation due to its simplicity and lack of serios adverse effects; There are two major routes for lidocaine administration systemic intravenous injection and local direct application on the laryngeal inlets such as spraying lidocaine on the supraglottic and subglottic regions or applying lidocaine jelly or sprayed (5)
Method
After ethical committee approval (ID: 22_2021) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients, this prospective randomized double blinded controlled study was carried out at El-Minia University Hospital during the
period from March 2021 to March 2022. The study was conducted on 80 adult patients. Written informed consent was obtained from all consecutive adult patients who were undergoing general anesthesia for elective keratoplasty and retinal detachment.
According to the sample size, the patients were allocated into 2 groups (40 patients on each group). Randomization was done according to computer Random number table. Only the researcher is doing the study. knows the subject the participant was receiving until the trial is over. The patient, the surgeon and the anesthetist who collect the data were blind to patient group.
Inclusion criteria:
1-Age 18-60
2-Both gender
3- intraocular surgery (cataract, glaucoma, vitrectomy and keratoplasty)
4- American Society of Anesthesiology class I and II
Exclusion criteria:
1-Major organ diseases (renal impairment, cardiorespiratory abnormalities, bronchial asthma, COPD, restrictive lung diseases, liver failure).
2-Allergy to drugs will be used
3-patient refuse
4-pregnancy-lactation
5-signicant obesity
Study groups:
Group L (40 patients): Received (5ml) 2% of lidocaine was sprayed down the intratracheal tube of patients.
Group C (40 patients): Received 5ml saline in medical spray bottle was sprayed down intratracheal tube of patients.
A careful medical history will be taken. General examinations include pulse, arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Physical examination includes chest, heart, abdomen, and other system. Routine investigations include complete blood picture (Hb, platelet), coagulation profile (PC, PT, INR), renal function test (urea, creatinine), liver function test (AST, ALT, albumin, bilirubin) and random blood sugar. Patients will be
randomized to two groups (40 patients in each group): When the patients will be admitted to the operating room, pulse oximeter, ECG, non-invasive blood pressure and peripheral oxygen saturation monitors will be applied until discharging the patient from the operative room. A 20 G cannula will be inserted in the dorsum of the hand and ringer lactate infusion will be started at 5-10ml\kg\hour. The ophthalmologist and anesthesiologist will be the same for all patients. Anesthesia was carried out with propofol (1-2mg/kg IV), atracurium (0.5 mg/kg IV) followed by insertion of endotracheal tube and maintained anesthesia with Isoflurane (1% - 1.5%), atracuruime (0,1 mg/kg intermittent every 20-30 minutes) to maintain controlled ventilation and oxygen. fentanyl will be given in operating room according to the patients need and clinical discretion. At the end of operation by 15min, 5ml 2% lidocaine in the L group, control group administrated 5ml saline sprayed down intratracheal tube of patients.
Statistical analysis
Data was analyzed using Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) software and expressed as mean ± standard deviation and median (minimum-maximum) for numerical data or as number and percent (%) for categorical data. Intergroup comparisons of continuous numerical variables were done using ANOVA test for parametric data or Kruskal Willis one way test for non-parametric data. Intragroup comparisons to baseline values were done using paired t-test for parametric data or Wilcoxon test for nonparametric data. The level of significance was fixed at a minimum of 0.05%.
Results
There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the two studied groups as regard age, sex, ASA, type of surgery, weight and duration of surgery.
Discussion
It is widely believed that approximately 82.5% of patients experience a cough upon emergence from general anesthesia (6). With causes possibly including the presence of an endotracheal tube, uncleared secretions, and anesthetic gas cough during tracheal extubation may lead to several complications, such as hypertension, tachycardia, myocardial ischemia and postoperative bleeding (7).
Several studies have shown that lidocaine can reduce the incidence and severity of cough during anesthetic emergence through different methods, including intracuff, tube lubrication, intratracheal instillation and intravenous bolus infusions before an induction (8).
In the present study, we found that lidocaine spray (1.5 mg/kg) was effective in attenuating the hemodynamic responses during extubation than the control. In Group-L, MAP remained below the baseline value throughout the study period but in Group-L, it raised before the extubation and the rise of HR was less in Group-L than Group-C.
Takita et al.,, used tracheal lignocaine (4%, 4 ml) before intubation, and they observed that tracheal lignocaine was very effective to reduce cardiovascular responses during intubation (9).
In contrast to our results, the study done by Benzadi et al., that measured the heart rate from 1 to 5 min after extubation shows no significant difference among the group with a p-value of 0.942 (10).
Jee and Park had compared the effect of 2% lignocaine in a dose of 1 mg/kg given endotracheally and intravenously 5 min and 3 min before extubation, respectively. In the results, lignocaine given endotracheally was better than the IV lignocaine in attenuating airway-circulatory reflexes during extubation (11).
Lee and Park had evaluated the effect of 10% lignocaine spray in a dose of 1.5 mg/kg to the larynx and trachea before suspended laryngoscopy and they observed that lignocaine spray (10%) was effective in attenuation of rise of arterial pressure during suspended laryngoscopy and suppression of a cough during extubation (12).
In our study there was a significant decrease in cough occurrence in group L when compared to group C (P value 0.0001, 0.003) at grades 0,2 respectively.
In a previous study Nath et al.,, 2018 aimed to test the hypothesis that alkalinized lidocaine would reduce the incidence of emergence cough after surgeries lasting <120 minutes. A total of 213 patients were randomized and 100 patients in each group completed the experimental protocol. Patients were divided into two groups. With either 2 mL of 2% lidocaine and 8 mL of 8.4% bicarbonate (group AL) or 10 mL of normal saline (group S). found that, the incidence of extubation cough in lidocaine group was 12%, significantly lower (1-sided P = .045) than the 22% incidence in normal saline group. The 1-tailed risk ratio for cough in lidocaine group was 0.55 (0–0.94, P = .045) (13)
References